Project teams, donor reporting and statutory accuracy.
Project teams, donor reporting and statutory accuracy.
An NGO's workforce reporting has an audience most organisations do not have: a funder who will check it. Staff are frequently funded against specific projects, contracts are fixed-term, field teams work away from any office, and the statutory position has to be right because it will be examined. PiPO HRIS matters here mainly for allocation and accuracy.
What is actually different here
- Staff cost is allocated against projects and funding lines, not just departments.
- Contracts are fixed-term and tied to project periods.
- Field teams work away from a head office, often with casual support staff.
- Donor reporting requires cost allocation that can be evidenced.
- Statutory accuracy is examined rather than assumed.
Where the platform carries the weight
Because cost is built from an approved payroll that is itself built from approved attendance, an allocation figure can be evidenced back to the work that produced it — which is the standard donor reporting actually requires.
- Workforce cost allocated by project, unit and funding line
- Fixed-term contracts tracked with end dates on the record
- Field and casual support staff on the same platform
- Statutory position visible before the period closes
- Allocation evidenced back to approved payroll and attendance
What changes
Common questions
Cost allocation follows the structure configured during implementation. How your organisation splits cost is a configuration decision we work through with you.
Contract type and dates are held on the employee record, and expiry is surfaced before it arrives.
Ready to see NGOs in action?
Tell us how your workforce operates and we will tailor the conversation around what you actually need to improve.